The validity of United States V. Nazemian following Crawford and its progeny: do criminal defendants have the right to face their interpreter at trial?/ John Kracum.
Material type:
TextPublication details: Evanston: Northwestern University Press, ©2014. Description: v104 n2, pages 431-456; 25 cmISSN: - 0091-4169
- DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Periodicals
|
UM Digos College - LIC | Periodicals | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | Periodical article |
Browsing UM Digos College - LIC shelves, Collection: Periodicals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2 Expungement and post- exoneration offending/ | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2 Creating constitutional procedure: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2 Autocorrect: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 2 The validity of United States V. Nazemian following Crawford and its progeny: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3 Parental incarceration: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3 "Obtaining" the right result: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3 Breaking free of the prison paradigm: |
The Journal of criminal law and criminology.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.