Confronting cognitive "anchoring effect" and "blind spot" biases in federal sentencing: a modest solution for reforming a fundamental flaw/ Mark W. Bennett.
Material type:
TextPublication details: Evanston: Northwestern University, ©2014.Description: pages 489-534; 25 cmISBN: - 00914169
- DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, no. 3
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Periodicals
|
UM Digos College - LIC | Periodicals | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, no. 3 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | Periodical article |
Browsing UM Digos College - LIC shelves, Collection: Periodicals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3 Breaking free of the prison paradigm: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3 Extending sentencing mitigation for deserving youth adults/ | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, n. 3-4 The Journal of criminal law and criminology. | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v. 104, no. 3 Confronting cognitive "anchoring effect" and "blind spot" biases in federal sentencing: | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v.104 n.3 Why so contrived? fourth amendment balancing, per se rules, and DNA databases after Maryland V. King/ | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v104 n1 Negotiating peremptory challenges/ | DPer 364.05 J82 2014 v104 n1 Crime Victims' rights during criminal investigations?: |
The Journal of criminal law and criminology.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.